• Home
  • Articles
  • About
  • Reading
  • Publications
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Shop
Australia and the UK put the AUKUS spin cycle on High

Australia and the UK put the AUKUS spin cycle on High

by Michael Shoebridge | Jul 29, 2025 | AUKUS, Strategy & Capability

So, is what we’ve just heard about the strength of Australian-UK relations and commitment to AUKUS fabulous news that reduces the risks and problems built into the nuclear sub pact?  No.   Does the new 50-year treaty, named after Geelong, a town in...
How to lose an alliance: PM’s shrinking ambition

How to lose an alliance: PM’s shrinking ambition

by Peter Jennings | Jul 5, 2025 | AUKUS, China, Policy

“It’s past the point that the failure of Donald Trump and the Prime Minister to meet face-to-face can be put down to diary difficulties. Anthony Albanese will not go to Washington – and it’s clear Trump is playing him.” Ernest Hemingway famously asked:...
Trouble in the Navy’s material world is trouble for Australia’s security – & AUKUS

Trouble in the Navy’s material world is trouble for Australia’s security – & AUKUS

by Michael Shoebridge | Jul 3, 2025 | AUKUS, Defence Budget, Featured, Strategy & Capability

The Navy is systematically failing to manage and maintain the two largest ships in its fleet – the 27,000 tonne LHD amphibious ships HMAS Canberra and HMAS Adelaide.  The scale of the troubles is laid out in a 108 page national audit office report, with almost...
Richard Marles and Australia’s defence ‘quality’ problem

Richard Marles and Australia’s defence ‘quality’ problem

by Michael Shoebridge | Jun 28, 2025 | Defence Budget, Europe, Policy

Why didn’t Richard Marles explain to Donald Trump and the other 31 leaders of NATO nations that they don’t need to invest more in their nations’ defence to deal with an aggressive Russia enabled by China? Instead, they only need to focus on the quality of their...
Needy, dismissive and critical: Australia & the US allliance

Needy, dismissive and critical: Australia & the US allliance

by Michael Shoebridge | Jun 24, 2025 | AUKUS, China, Defence Budget, Indo Pacific, Policy

The Albanese government’s relationship with the US Trump Administration is a mix of contradictions–needy, dismissive and critical. It’s hard to see this as working well for either nation right now, and the US probably cares less about this than we do. The personality...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Recent Posts

  • Trump’s FY27 budget: $1.5 trillion for the Pentagon, $33bn for the State Department. Peace through missiles?
  • America’s wartime defense budget: $1.5 trillion to deliver a military able to fight everyone – except China…..
  • The Gulf collective defence exercise: a war no one admits to fighting
  • Tired of winning: US government shows how to lose an industry & hurt its friends
  • Our Kentucky Colonel masters deflection, the War & AUKUS sub outcomes – magical thinking meets US & UK partner realities

Recent Comments

  1. binance on Change, not continuity, is what’s needed to meet the ever-growing threat from China
  2. 注册Binance on Show some steel on China’s investment in our critical assets
  3. binance konto on The Three Body Problem by Cixin Liu
  4. vytvorení úctu na binance on Taiwan: four big reasons it matters to Australians
  5. Create a free account on Chaotic start to 2023 for our China strategy

© Strategic Analysis Australia 2026

Designed by baha.agency